MyPolitics-Forum.com

Go Back   MyPolitics-Forum.com > Community > Off-Topic

» Welcome, Guest!
Welcome to MyPolitics-Forum.com, brought to you by the same folks who bring you MyMedia-Forum.com.
Thanks for dropping by! Is the page too narrow for your preference? Once you register, you will be able to set it to your liking! You will need to register before you can post, so why not get it out of the way now? Enjoy! :)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 12th, 2017, 08:22 AM
akayy akayy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 119
Default Re: Love and compassion

حرام
Drawing animate beings such as people and animals is haraam, and is in fact a major sin.

It is not permissible to make images of these animals because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) cursed the image-makers and said: “The most severely punished of the people on the Day of Resurrection will be the image-makers.” This indicates that making images is a major sin, because this curse only applies to major sins, and the warning of severe punishment only applies to major sins. But it is possible to draw part of the body such as a hand or foot, etc, because these parts cannot live independently, and the apparent meaning of the texts is that what is forbidden is that which could live (independently), because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said in some ahaadeeth: “He (the image maker) will be told to breathe life into it and he will not be able to do so.”

muhammad (pbuh) the natural successor to christ (pbuh) :: lecture by ahmed deedat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dDg1myyfJ8
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #32  
Old December 19th, 2017, 08:26 AM
akayy akayy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 119
Default Re: Love and compassion

--------
It is not permissible to draw and make images of animate beings, whether they are engraved, on paper, on cloth or anything else, because of the report narrated by al-Bukhaari (2105) and Muslim (2107) from ‘Aa’ishah the Mother of the Believers (may Allaah be pleased with her), that she bought a cushion on which there were images. When the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) saw it, he stood at the door and did not enter. She said: I recognized displeasure in his face. I said: O Messenger of Allaah, I repent to Allaah and His Messenger, what have I done wrong? The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “What is this pillow?” She said: I bought it for you to sit on and recline on. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The makers of these images will be punished and it will be said to them, ‘Bring to life that which you have created.’” Then he said: “The house in which there are images is not entered by the angels.”

And Muslim (2110) narrated that Sa’eed ibn Abi’l-Hasan said: A man came to Ibn ‘Abbaas and said: I am a man who makes these images; advise me about that. He said to him: Come close to me. So he came closer to him. He said: Come closer to me. So he came closer to him, until he put his hand on his head and said: I will tell you what I heard from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “Every image maker will be in Hell, and for every image that he made, a soul will be created which will punish him in Hell.” He said: If you must do that, then make (images of) trees and inanimate things.

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Sharh Saheeh Muslim: Our companions and other scholars said: Making images of animals is emphatically haraam and is a major sin, because this stern warning which is mentioned in the ahaadeeth is issued concerning it. That applies whether he makes it to be used in ways that are not respectful or otherwise. Making it is haraam in all cases, because it is competing with the creation of Allaah. That applies whether the image is in a garment or a carpet or a dirham or a dinar or a penny or a vessel or a wall or anything else. As for making images of trees, camel saddles and other things in which there are no images of animals, that is not haraam. End quote.

It says in Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah (1/479): What makes images forbidden is the fact that they are images of animate beings, whether they are sculptures, or drawings on walls or fabric or paper, or they are woven, and whether they are done with a quill, a pen, or a machine, and whether they represent something real or something imaginary, whether they are small or large, beautified or distorted, or drawn in the form of lines representing a skeleton. What makes them forbidden is that fact that they depict animate beings, even if they are imaginary like pictures of ancient people, Pharaohs, or leaders and soldiers of the Crusades, or like the pictures of ‘Eesa (Jesus) and Maryam (Mary) that are kept in churches, etc., because of the general meaning of the texts, and because that is competing with the creation of Allaah, and because it is a means that leads to shirk.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJPYYqnbd9k
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #33  
Old December 26th, 2017, 08:31 AM
akayy akayy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 119
Default Re: Love and compassion

Christmas and 25th of December
Many Christians are unaware that the true spirit of reverence which Muslims display towards Jesus and his mother Mary spring from the fountainhead of their faith as prescribed in the Holy Quran. Most do not know that a Muslim does not take the name of Jesus , without saying Eesa alai-hiss-salaam i.e. (Jesus peace be upon him).


Jesus is commonly considered to have been born on the 25th of December. However, it is common knowledge among Christian scholars that he was not born on this day. It is well known that the first Christian churches held their festival in May, April, or January. Scholars of the first two centuries AD even differ in which year he was born. Some believing that he was born fully twenty years before the current accepted date. So how was the 25th of December selected as the birthday of Jesus ?

Grolier's encyclopedia says: "Christmas is the feast of the birth of Jesus Christ, celebrated on December 25 ... Despite the beliefs about Christ that the birth stories expressed, the church did not observe a festival for the celebration of the event until the 4th century.... since 274, under the emperor Aurelian, Rome had celebrated the feast of the "Invincible Sun" on December 25. In the Eastern Church, January 6, a day also associated with the winter solstice, was initially preferred. In course of time, however, the West added the Eastern date as the Feast of the Epiphany, and the East added the Western date of Christmas".

So who else celebrated the 25th of December as the birth day of their gods before it was agreed upon as the birth day of Jesus ? Well, there are the people of India who rejoice, decorate their houses with garlands, and give presents to their friends on this day. The people of China also celebrate this day and close their shops. Buddha is believed to have been born on this day. The great savior and god of the Persians, Mithras, is also believed to have been born on the 25th of December long before the coming of Jesus .

The Egyptians celebrated this day as the birth day of their great savior Horus, the Egyptian god of light and the son of the "virgin mother" and "queen of the heavens" Isis. Osiris, god of the dead and the underworld in Egypt, the son of "the holy virgin", again was believed to have been born on the 25th of December.

The Greeks celebrated the 25th of December as the birthday of Hercules, the son of the supreme god of the Greeks, Zeus, through the mortal woman Alcmene Bacchus, the god of wine and revelry among the Romans (known among the Greeks as Dionysus) was also born on this day.

Adonis, revered as a "dying-and-rising god" among the Greeks, miraculously was also born on the 25th of December. His worshipers held him a yearly festival representing his death and resurrection, in midsummer. The ceremonies of his birthday are recorded to have taken place in the same cave in Bethlehem which is claimed to have been the birth place of Jesus .

The Scandinavians celebrated the 25th of December as the birthday of their god Freyr, the son of their supreme god of the heavens, Odin.

The Romans observed this day as the birthday of the god of the sun, Natalis Solis Invicti ("Birthday of Sol the invincible"). There was great rejoicing and all shops were closed. There was illumination and public games. Presents were exchanged, and the slaves were indulged in great liberties. These are the same Romans who would later preside over the council of Nicea (325 CE) which lead to the official Christian recognition of the "Trinity" as the "true" nature of God, and the "fact" that Jesus was born on the 25th of December too.

In Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Gibbon says: "The Roman Christians, ignorant of his (Christ's) birth, fixed the solemn festival to the 25th of December, the Brumalia, or Winter Solstice, when the Pagans annually celebrated the birth of Sol " vol. ii, p. 383.

Christians opposed to Christmas

There are several Christian groups who are opposed to Christmas. For example, they take the verse from the Bible in Jeremiah 10:2-4 as an admonition against decorating Christmas trees.

The King James Version reads: "Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen.... For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not."

In order to understand this subject, it is helpful to trace some of the history of Christmas avoidance, particularly its roots in Puritanism.

The Puritans believed that the first-century church modeled a Christianity that modern Christians should copy. They attempted to base their faith and practice solely on the New Testament, and their position on Christmas reflected their commitment to practice a pure, scriptural form of Christianity. Puritans argued that God reserved to himself the determination of all proper forms of worship, and that he disapproved of any human innovations - even innovations that celebrated the great events of salvation. The name Christmas also alienated many Puritans.


Christmas, after all, meant "the mass of Christ." The mass was despised as a Roman Catholic institution that undermined the Protestant concept of Christ, who offered himself once for all. The Puritans' passionate avoidance of any practice that was associated with papal Rome caused them to overlook the fact that in many countries the name for the day had nothing to do with the Catholic mass, but focused instead on Jesus' birth. The mass did not evolve into the form abhorred by Protestants until long after Christmas was widely observed. The two customs had separate, though interconnected, histories.

As ardent Protestants, Puritans identified the embracing of Christianity by the Roman Emperor Constantine in the early 300s CE as the starting point of the degeneration and corruption of the church. They believed the corruption of the church was brought on by the interweaving of the church with the pagan Roman state. To Puritans, Christmas was impure because it entered the Roman Church sometime in this period. No one knows the exact year or under what circumstances Roman Christians began to celebrate the birth of their Lord, but by the mid-300s CE, the practice was well established.
حكم التهنئة بالكريسماس - ذاكر نايك Zakir Naik
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X5pDQQ9EU8



when Christ was born Ahmed Deedat a lecture debates youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFfPTgHee6c


Christ in Islam a sequel (full studio debate) - Sheikh Ahmed ...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSWHt5oVAGk
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #34  
Old December 26th, 2017, 12:45 PM
Mr Mo's Avatar
Mr Mo Mr Mo is offline
Immoderate
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: RenCo, NYS, USA
Posts: 1,858
Default Re: Love and compassion

According to many scholars it's most likely that Jesus of Nazareth was born in the summer. Due to the fact that many calendars of that time in Europe and Asia (Minor) didn't account for the extra 1/4 day in the solar year, lack of a Leap Day caused the seasons and months to stop lining up exactly - the months would slowly creep into differing seasons over the course of centuries. Of course this was fixed by the time that the Gregorian calendric system was widely and officially adopted by the Holy Roman Catholic Church. However, at around that same time, the Catholics were trying hard to spread their faith through northern Europe, a very difficult and bloody task which created hundreds if not thousands of saints and martyrs every decade. By keeping the major Christian holidays close to natural occurences like Solstices and Equinoxes, as well as Norse celebration days, they were able to make Christianity more palatable to the peoples of Northern Europe.

And just as an aside, the Norse god Frey wasn't (and isn't) considered a son of Odin (Wotan). The Thunder god Thor is Odin's full-blooded son and heir, while the Trickster god Loki is Odin's son by a female frost giant. Or at least so say the remaining legends.
__________________
Tax The Churches.

"Facts are stupid things."
-Ronald Reagan

Once known as Left-Wing Nutjob
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #35  
Old January 2nd, 2018, 08:26 AM
akayy akayy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 119
Default Re: Love and compassion

يدخل الاسلام بسبب اطفال مسلمين تلاميذه في المدرسة يروي قصته كيف اسلم سبحان الله

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ygN8ejZ2Us

Jon Dean A Scientist - Why I Converted To Islam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OltaN9VY5ng


New Convert To Islam - How Islam Stole My Heart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbZ5ueCHEvE
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #36  
Old January 9th, 2018, 08:56 AM
akayy akayy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 119
Default Re: Love and compassion

What is your position on political cartoons which are not exact representations of people and animals but, rather, exaggerations for the purpose of delivering a message?

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) told us that the one who makes images – by drawing or engraving –will be punished on the Day of Resurrection, and these images whose makers are given this warning are images of animate beings, based on what its says in the hadeeth, that Allaah will say: “Give life to that which you have crated.”

It was narrated from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Those who make images will be punished on the Day of Resurrection, and it will be said to them: ‘Bring to life that which you have created.’” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (5607) and Muslim (2108).

It seems that images with incomplete features and those which do not have a nose or eyes are not included in the images that are haraam, and their makers are not included in the warning, because they cannot really be called images and these pictures are not competing with the creation of Allaah.

It was narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Among the people who will be most severely punished on the Day of Resurrection will be those who imitate the creation of Allaah.”

Narrated by al-Bukhaari (5610) and Muslim (2107).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb1iiSxf3W4
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #37  
Old January 11th, 2018, 12:16 AM
Mr Mo's Avatar
Mr Mo Mr Mo is offline
Immoderate
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: RenCo, NYS, USA
Posts: 1,858
Default Re: Love and compassion

My position on it is that creating images is not in itself sinful, nor is trying to capture an aspect or perspective on any living thing.

What i could potentially see as sinful image-making is when the image maker intentionally misrepresents the subject with malicious intent.

I know you disagree with me, but do you understand my position?
__________________
Tax The Churches.

"Facts are stupid things."
-Ronald Reagan

Once known as Left-Wing Nutjob
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #38  
Old January 16th, 2018, 01:20 PM
akayy akayy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 119
Default Re: Love and compassion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mo View Post
My position on it is that creating images is not in itself sinful, nor is trying to capture an aspect or perspective on any living thing.

What i could potentially see as sinful image-making is when the image maker intentionally misrepresents the subject with malicious intent.

I know you disagree with me, but do you understand my position?
someone told me
Thank you for that, akay. As cartoons and caricature are not exact representations nor imitating the creations of Allah then my work is not haraam.

This is comforting to learn and gives my work legitimacy.

With regard to stuffed toys in which the image is not clear, even though there are limbs, heads and shoulders, but they have no eyes or noses, there is nothing wrong with them because this is not competing with the creation of Allaah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpA5a100M1A
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #39  
Old Yesterday, 08:57 AM
akayy akayy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 119
Default Re: Love and compassion

It is well known in our religion that the basic principle with regard to drawings and pictures of animate beings is that they are haraam, because of the many ahaadeeth in which it says that they are forbidden and warn against them. We have previously explained that in a number of questions on this site. Please see, for example, question no. 7222.

It is well known in the principles of fiqh on which there is consensus that in cases of necessity, forbidden things are permitted, so the ruling may change from prohibition to permission if that will lead to achieving one of the five necessities that Islam came to protect, which are: religion, life, physical health, honour and wealth.

Because medicine is one of the necessary sciences that people need, to such an extent that some scholars regarded it as a communal obligation, this means that some things are permitted which are basically forbidden, in order to fulfil this communal obligation.

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Rawdat al-Taalibeen (1/223):

With regard to sciences, some of them are a communal obligation, such as medicine. End quote.

Indeed, Muwaffaq al-Deen al-Baghdaadi narrated in his book al-Tibb min al-Kitaab wa’l-Sunnah (187) that Imam al-Shaafa’i said:

I do not know of any branch of knowledge, after knowledge of halaal and haraam, that is more noble than medicine. End quote.

Even if a doctor does not treat women except in cases of necessity, he must learn how to treat both sexes, because a woman may not be able to find a female doctor in a certain specialty or in a certain city. Also, knowledge of medicine is based on understanding the makeup of the human body, and the features of its various parts, and details of their functions. How well the doctor understands that will determine how well he knows medicine and how successful he is in ridding people of problems and diseases.

Hence there is nothing wrong with the doctor studying drawings that show the human body, whether they are of men or women, and there is nothing wrong – in sha Allaah – with using drawings in exams for students of medicine and life sciences, as that will help them to understand properly and learn this knowledge correctly.

In our religion it is permissible for women to treat men in cases of necessity.

It was narrated that al-Rubayyi’ bint Mu’awwidh (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: We were with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), bringing water, treating the wounded and carrying the slain back to Madeenah. Narrated by al-Bukhaari (2882).

Ibn Hajar said, commenting on this hadeeth in Fath al-Baari (6/52):

This shows that it is permissible for a non-mahram woman to treat a non-mahram man in cases of necessity. End quote.

In our religion there is also evidence which indicates that it is permissible to make pictures and images for children’s toys, because children need to play and learn.
In a Fatwa issued by the scholars of the Standing Committee, there is evidence which indicates that it is permissible to make pictures in cases of necessity, such as pictures to prove the identity of a person and the like.

As for making pictures and drawing parts of the body separately, such as the head or the chest, many scholars are of the view that it is permissible.

All of the above indicates that it is permissible to use drawing and pictures in studying medicine, etc.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwSPJ4BqhZs



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZI9E8sbAZ8



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quwh5V6yXEg



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_aMWSFoWSE
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply
« MyPolitics-Forum.com > Community > Off-Topic »


Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Online Users: 6
0 members and 6 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,970, July 28th, 2013 at 05:37 AM.
» Recent Threads
  RatingTitle, Username, & Date Last Post Replies Views Forum
Government shutdown /highly likely/
azteclady
January 19th, 2018 12:40 PM
Yesterday 01:49 PM
by azteclady
5 71 US Politics
Love and compassion ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
akayy
April 23rd, 2016 10:49 AM
Yesterday 08:57 AM
by akayy
38 6,849 Off-Topic
What's the future of the Trump... ( 1 2 )
Mr Mo
February 19th, 2017 06:00 PM
January 12th, 2018 03:06 PM
by Ridgell
19 2,925 US Politics
Gerrymandering
azteclady
December 13th, 2017 08:30 PM
January 12th, 2018 05:19 AM
by Mr Mo
6 231 US Politics
Conspiracy against the United States
azteclady
October 30th, 2017 03:07 PM
January 11th, 2018 02:34 AM
by azteclady
9 416 US Politics
Alabama, special election, one party...
azteclady
November 16th, 2017 03:02 PM
January 11th, 2018 12:18 AM
by Mr Mo
6 311 US Politics
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Graphic Design by Crazy Creative

 Protected by : ZB BLOCK  &  StopForumSpam 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.